Showing posts with label State Dept of Health. Show all posts
Showing posts with label State Dept of Health. Show all posts

Wednesday, December 28, 2011

Release of 2010 Indiana Medical Errors Report Poorly Covered by Media

Although dated for 11/7/2011, the 2010 Indiana Medical Error Report was released to the public on 11/28/2011.

The link to the press release is here.
The link to the report itself is here.
The link to the data tables (containing facility specific numbers) is here.

In the month since the release of this report, coverage from the media has been disappointing. A brief google scan of Indiana news coverage shows the following:
  • The Indy Star and WTHR carried the same small piece on 11/29/2011 highlighting that bed sores were the most commonly reported error and foreign objects left inside patients after surgery was the second. To it's credit, the report did not single out any hospital with high raw numbers.
  • However, on the day that the report was released, WTHR posted a separate story on its website highlighting that medical errors had reached a new high. Unfortunately, it reported raw numbers of events at various central Indiana facilities without any type of responsible interpretation. This story did attempt to offer readers advice on how to stay safe, however, the reporter clearly confused prevention concepts (surgery site marking, patient turning) with error reporting ("...what can you do if you suspect an error?).
  • On 12/2/2011, the Palladium-Item from Richmond, IN, carried a story highlighting the performance of its local hospital (Reid). It focused on the two patients that Reid reported fell in 2010 causing serious disability or death. It appears that the reporter (Pam Tharp) did interview hospital officials (a vice president, the director of patient safety and quality, and a spokesman) and provided quotes to balance the reported numbers. The story then proceeded to report the 5-Year reporting high, but noted possible explanations (changes in operational definitions) for this.
  • The Herald-Bulletin (Anderson), ran a story on 12/8/2011 describing the performance of the two area hospitals. The CEO of Community hospital provided detail of the hospitals process to minimize missing sponges and that it seeks to learn from its errors. The President of Saint John's Hospital and its CNO both provided similar detail as to how it prevents bed sores. Healthcare quality professionals will be happy to see that this article also noted that "Medical errors generally are not the sole result of people’s actions but rather the failure of the systems and processes used in providing health care... The requirement to report events identifies persistent problems, encourages increased awareness of patient safety issues and assists in the development of evidence-based initiatives to improve patient safety."
Of the above referenced coverage, it would appear that the reporter from the Herald-Bulletin (Abbey Dole) provided the most responsible reporting of the annual Medical Error report. With a story that could easily be irresponsibly covered to incite and inflame the public, this reporter educated the public on how the medical error reporting system helps healthcare in Indiana become safer.

Sunday, August 23, 2009

2008 Indiana Medical Errors Report Released

On 8-20-09 the Indiana State Dept. of Health released its 2008 report on medical errors reported by hospitals, ambulatory surgery centers, and abortion clinics via the reporting system mandated by the Governor in 2005 to start CY2006.

The State's Medical Error Reporting System webpage is here: http://www.in.gov/isdh/23433.htm (Note: The State frequently changes its webpage urls and thus the link may become useless at any time. It was working this morning.)

The 2008 report itself can be found here: http://www.in.gov/isdh/files/2008_MERS_Report.pdf
Data Tables: http://www.in.gov/isdh/files/2008_MERS_Data_Tables.pdf
Appendix: http://www.in.gov/isdh/files/2008_MERS_Appendices.pdf

The 2008 Report also contains descriptions of patient safety improvements efforts and activities that are ongoing throughout the state.

Note that the reporting rules have changed for CY2009. Prior to 1-1-09, 27 events had to be reported. Twenty-Eight events are now covered by the reporting system. The new list is here: http://www.in.gov/isdh/files/28_REPORTABLE_EVENTS.pdf

The release of the report has been lightly covered by local media:
IndyStar:
http://www.indystar.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=2009908210343
WTHR:
http://www.wthr.com/Global/story.asp?s=10964770



Friday, June 19, 2009

Side-by-Side Healthcare Reform Proposal Comparisons

http://www.kff.org/healthreform/sidebyside.cfm

The Kaiser Family Foundation has created a website that will allow you to compare all the current healthcare reform proposals. It is at the link above. The website says that the information was last updated 6-16-09. Very interesting site.

Sunday, April 26, 2009

IHA Update

The following is the most recent legislative update from the IHA. Items that may be of interest to healthcare quality professionals are in red.



General Assembly Faces April 29 Deadline
With the final day for action in the General Assembly less than one week away, conference committees are busy working out compromises between House and Senate versions of legislation. There are plenty of meetings today and rumors that more will be scheduled for Saturday and even possibly Sunday. Needless to say, many members of the General Assembly will not be headed home for the weekend.

Many significant bills failed to clear both chambers, but legislation that previously passed either the House or Senate is usually eligible to be placed into another “live” bill. Check the latest Bill Track to see which bills are headed to conference committee, which ones could be brought back, and which ones likely remain off the table in 2009.

In addition to monitoring the final days of the legislative session, IHA will also participate in the American Hospital Association’s annual meeting in Washington, D.C. and engaging with members of Congress. Key topics that will be addressed are the needs of hospitals in the current economic and financial crisis, concerns over the Employee Free Choice Act, possible reductions in Medicare reimbursement, and national health reform.

HIP Changes in Limbo (SB 472)
IHA has closely followed SB 472, authored by Sen. Pat Miller (R-Indianapolis), even after the hospital assessment and the “HIP 2” proposal was removed earlier this session. As it passed the Senate, this legislation would have allowed certain Hoosiers to buy into the HIP program without state support by paying the full premium as well as making any POWER account contributions. It also would have specified that the minimum POWER account contribution required for HIP enrollees would be $60 (FSSA believes that this minimum payment is critical to maintaining the element of personal responsibility within the HIP program).

In addition to the eligibility changes, SB 472 would have also permitted non-for-profit foundations to contribute to a participant’s required POWER account payments. As passed in the Senate, the amount a not-for-profit could contribute would be 50 percent. Later amendment in the House increased the share to 75 percent.

Other amendments added in the House would have broadened HIP eligibility by reducing the time for which an individual must be without health insurance from six to three months. Another change would increase the share that participating employers can pay for employees’ POWER account payments from 50 percent to 75 percent.

The bill was withdrawn before a third reading vote in the House, and it did not pass before the deadline on April 16. Some raised concerns that certain elements of SB 472 could lead to Hoosiers dropping their private insurance to join HIP. It is important to note that while the cap of 34,000 has been reached for non-parental adults, sufficient funding remains available to enroll thousands more eligible parents or “caretaker adults” in HIP.

The language allowing foundations to contribute to POWER accounts was of particular interest to many hospitals, and it could be revived in a different bill before session’s end. Such language, however, has not yet been inserted into any other conference committee reports.


Indiana Innovation Alliance May Be Funded
There has been only one public conference committee meeting to date on HB 1001, but the prospects for Indiana Innovation Alliance funding improved when it was included in the Senate-passed budget. This proposal is a joint request by Indiana and Purdue Universities, and hospitals may be particularly interested in the component of the program to expand medical education to include two- to four-year programs in Bloomington, Evansville, Fort Wayne, Gary, Indianapolis, Muncie, New Albany, South Bend, Terre Haute, and West Lafayette.

The Senate Republicans’ budget assumed the latest revenue forecast would reflect a shortfall of $1 billion, but by fully-utilizing the significant dollars allocated to Indiana through the stimulus legislation they were able to accommodate this program in their plan.

The Senate provided approximately $26 million for state fiscal years 2010 and 2011 as follows:

  • $5 million/year: Medical Education Center Expansion (to increase the medical school class size by 30 percent statewide)
  • $3.8 million/year: Technical Assistance and Advanced Manufacturing (to expand post-graduate pharmacy residency training for post-graduate biomedical engineering specialization and for the Healthcare TAP program at Purdue)
  • $11.3 million/year: Core Research
  • $5.6 million/year: Matching Grants for Federal Research Projects

IU and Purdue were seeking a total of $35 million per year, and the House budget funded the whole program at this level in its one-year budget bill earlier in the session. You can read more about the Alliance at http://www.indianainnovationalliance.org/.

Smokefree Air Legislation Revived
As indicated in the most recent IHA Bill Track, a good deal of legislation that was previously approved by only one chamber remains in play—very little is ever entirely dead during conference committees. HB 1213, the smoke-free air bill, passed the Indiana House by a vote of 70-26, but did not receive a hearing in the Senate Commerce and Public Policy & Interstate Cooperation Committee. However, the author of the original bill, Rep. Charlie Brown, has attempted to insert a revised proposal into HB 1208.

In a conference committee meeting this week, the contents of HB 1208 (establishing a mental health corrections quality advisory committee and a related multi-agency task force) were moved into another bill and replaced with a smoke-free air proposal. The conference committee has not yet acted on HB 1208, but Rep. Brown has asked other legislators to assess what level of support exists for his proposal. To move HB 1208 forward for a full vote in the House and Senate, all four conferees would have to sign off on the report. Rep. Eric Turner, Sen. Connie Lawson, and Sen. Vi Simpson are the other conferees along with Rep. Brown.

The bill as originally introduced contained a comprehensive smoking ban in public places, including bars, casinos, and all other enclosed areas of employment. The bill was lauded by IHA and the Indiana Campaign for Smokefree Air (of which IHA is a member) as a major step forward in protecting the health of Hoosier workers. The bill met a set-back when the House Public Policy Committee passed a heavily amended bill that exempted casinos and most bars.
Rep. Brown has proposed to exempt only casinos in HB 1208. However, since the chair of the Senate Commerce Committee did not hear the original bill, we do not expect that the conferee representing the Senate majority caucus (Sen. Lawson) would sign any conference committee report on this topic.

Admitting Privileges Receive Scrutiny
As it passed the Indiana Senate earlier this session, SB 89 would have required physicians performing abortions in Indiana to have “admitting privileges” at a hospital in that county or an adjacent county. When the bill came to the House Public Policy Committee, IHA was asked to testify on SB 89 solely to provide answers regarding the nature of admitting privileges.

SB 89 was later expanded greatly on the House floor on April 13 and passed the House on April 15. The changes to the bill include requiring any “health care provider licensed by the state” performing a “surgical procedure” to have admitting privileges at a hospital in that county or an adjacent county. “Surgical procedure” was not further defined, which meant that thousands of medical professionals could be impacted.

Although this problematic language passed, other proposals that would have mandated how hospitals award admitting privileges were defeated. It is likely that admitting privileges will continue to receive scrutiny from now until the end of the session on April 29. On Tuesday, the Indianapolis Star published an article on SB 89 and cited information provided by IHA. Read the article here:
http://www.indystar.com/article/20090421/NEWS05/904210376.

Sen. Patricia Miller has dissented with the changes made by the House and the matter will likely be taken up by a conference committee. The Senate has appointed conferees and advisers but the House had not yet named its appointments as of April 23. IHA anticipates that the language broadening the requirement to all surgical procedures will be removed. IHA will continue to monitor the bill and defend against any possible attempts to dictate how hospitals grant admitting privileges.

State Revenue Forecast Mixed; Documents Online
The new state forecast projects that Indiana will take in slightly more tax revenue over the biennium than some had feared, but this optimism has been openly questioned by legislators. The budget writers will have about $830 million less than was estimated based on the December 2008 forecast, but some expected the shortfall to exceed $1 billion.

Following the presentation to the State Budget Committee, the forecast documents were posted to the Budget Agency’s website. The “Economic Outlook” document from Nigel Gault, chief U.S. economist for HIS Global Insight, is particularly interesting:
http://www.in.gov/sba/2489.htm.

Thursday, March 12, 2009

IHA News Update - March 11, 2009

The following is the cut and paste of the March 11 IHA News Update. Items of interest to healthcare quality professionals are highlighted in red.


Hospital Leaders Meet With Legislators at Hospital Day
IHA members interacted with more than half of the General Assembly during yesterday’s Hospital Day at the Statehouse. “Hospital Day was a huge success,” said Matthew Bailey, IHA chairman and president of Good Samaritan Hospital, Vincennes. “There was a lot of interaction between members and legislators, and the governor’s address was a great addition to the program.”

The meeting began with a lively Indiana Week in Review panel discussion led by WISH TV’s Jim Shella. Next, IHA presented an award to Gov. Daniels. The governor addressed the group and then took member questions. He commended hospital leaders for their statesmanship and praised members for placing patients’ needs before institutional needs. In particular he noted leadership in regards to patient safety and expanding access through the Healthy Indiana Plan. The governor also talked about improving Indiana’s health status measures and health information technology.

Members were also provided with a legislative update, talking points, and a Statehouse tour. The 2008 PAC awards were also presented. Attendance at the legislator reception exceeded expectations. Many hospitals were able to meet with their legislators during the reception and others scheduled meetings with them during the day.

Click here to view photos from yesterday’s Hospital Day at the Statehouse.

PAC Award Winners Announced at Hospital Day
IHA recognized several hospitals for their performance during the 2008 Friends of Indiana Hospitals campaign at Hospital Day.

The William S. Hall Award, IHA’s “most-improved” award went to Good Samaritan Hospital, Vincennes. Matthew Bailey is president and CEO. Two organizations earned honorable mentions for this category—Bloomington Hospital, Mark E. Moore, president/CEO; and St. Catherine Hospital Inc., East Chicago, Jo Ann Birdzell, administrator.

The highest percentage of goal award went to Henry County Hospital, New Castle. Blake Dye is president and CEO. Honorable mentions for this category went to Dupont Hospital, Fort Wayne, Dr. Michael H. Schatzlein, president/CEO; Bedford Regional Medical Center, Bradford W. Dykes, president/CEO; and Schneck Medical Center, Seymour, Gary A. Meyer, president/CEO.

AHAPAC MVP awards were also presented. The AHA MVP award winners were Blake Dye, president/CEO, Henry County Hospital, New Castle; and Matthew Bailey, president/CEO, Good Samaritan Hospital, Vincennes.

Bloomington, Clarian to Merge
Bloomington Hospital is moving forward with plans to integrate with Indianapolis-based Clarian Health. A definitive agreement has been signed. The merger is expected to be completed in 18 months.

ISDH Alerts Hospitals to Spend Disaster Funds Now
The Indiana State Department of Health is alerting hospitals that all disaster preparedness funds received under the 2008 contract must be spent by June 30 or will be subject to forfeiture to the state. Contract funds received in 2009 must be spent by Oct.7. If additional needs cannot be identified within an organization, funds may also be signed over to their districts for use on projects.

Seventeen percent of funds issued through the ISDH have not been reported as spent. Consult with your disaster preparedness coordinator to ensure that you have appropriately documented and reported your expenditures and that all funds are being used to improve your organization's disaster preparedness.


Program on Stimulus Provisions Set for April 23
Register now for e-Health Care Transformation: Demystifying the Stimulus Bill HITECH Provisions. The program is set for April 23 at the Montage, Indianapolis. Topics to be covered include medical identity theft red flags, mandated e-prescribing, HIPAA privacy and security requirement changes, and the implementation of telehealth to address workforce shortage issues. The program will also provide an overview of the economic stimulus package provisions for information technology and a practical approach to spending stimulus dollars on heath IT projects. To register, visit
www.regonline.com/iha2009e-health.

IHA Leadership Conference set for May 21
Mark your calendars for the 2009 IHA Leadership Conference set for May 21 at The Montage, Indianapolis. The program will be led by Sg2 Chairman and CEO Michael Sachs. Sachs will provide demand forecasts using IHA’s inpatient and outpatient data. The forecast will factor in market volatility; alignment changes; demand shifts; and changes in coverage.

Using effective forecasting techniques, this program will help leaders manage uncertainty by projecting how change will impact health care service delivery in the future. Registration information will be available in the near future. To learn more about Sg2 visit their Web site at
http://www.sg2.com/.

Registration Deadline for Retention Briefing Extended
The registration deadline for Engaging and Retaining Nurses: A Prescription for Redesign in Tough Economic Times has been extended until Monday. The program is set for March 18 at the Hilton Indianapolis North. Following the session, participants will have: an understanding of the role nurse retention plays in effective and efficient care; knowledge of Transforming Care at the Bedside—its principles, processes, and outcomes; an understanding of “vitality” and its contribution to nurse retention and care redesign; tools for measuring and improving vitality among nurses and other caregivers; a framework for developing nursing leadership competencies to support innovation; and techniques to engage frontline staff. To register, visit
www.regonline.com/iha2009rnretention.

careLearning Informational Webinar Set for April 9
careLearning will host an informational webinar on April 9 for those interested in learning more about online education opportunities. The program will feature an overview of careSkills- a competency module that allows health care organizations to identify, assess, and analyze the skills, knowledge, and abilities of its workforce. Several IHA members are already enjoying the numerous benefits careLearning has to offer.
Click here to read the careLearning newsletter and to view a list of upcoming webinars. You do not have to be a member of careLearning to participate in the webinars.

WHO to Launch Global Hand Hygiene Initiative
In May, the World Health Organizations will launch a new global initiative called SAVE LIVES: Clean Your Hands. The aim is to globally improve hand hygiene compliance in order to improve patient safety. The WHO hopes to engage 5000 hospitals by 2010. Over 280 hospitals have already indicated their interest in participating. Learn more at
savelives@who.int.

Monday, January 19, 2009

Mandatory MRSA Reporting in Indiana?

Last Friday (January 16th) Indiana Representative Cynthia Noe (District 87) introduced legislation (House Bill 1539) which calls for mandatory public reporting of hospital MRSA rates. The current text of the bill is as follows:

SECTION 1. IC 16-21-2-17 IS ADDED TO THE INDIANA CODE AS A NEW SECTION TO READ AS FOLLOWS [EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2009]:
Sec. 17. (a) As used in this section, "methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus" means the strain of staphylococcus aureus bacteria, also known as MRSA, that is:
(1) resistant to oxacillin or methicillin; and
(2) identified according to the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute's Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing.
(b) Each hospital shall develop a plan to reduce the incidence of persons contracting the methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus infection at the hospital. The plan must include the specific strategies, patient screening practices, and infection control practices that the hospital will implement to reduce the incidence of methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus infections.
(c) Before January 1, 2010, each hospital shall submit a plan prepared under this section to the state department. Each hospital shall submit an updated plan to the state department biennially.
(d) Before March 1 of each year, each hospital shall submit to the state department a report of the methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus infection rate at the hospital during the previous year in a form determined by the state department.
(e) Information submitted to the state department under this section is a public record.

Although transparency in healthcare is a good thing, I don't think this legislation will accomplish much beyond creating a lot of busy work for hospitals. The resulting data will be of questionable value.
  • The information submitted to the State Department of Health will be a public record.
  • However, will the State Department of Health have the resources to crunch the numbers in a way that will allow for fair comparisons between hospitals? The financial impact statement for this bill has already been published. It says that this bill is not expected to have a financial impact on the ISDH. What that tells me is that there is no intention to create a system to risk-adjust the rates. In other words, it is the raw data that the public will have access to.
  • How will the hospital know if the MRSA infection was pick up in the hospital or before the patient entered the hospital? Test EVERYONE upon admission to a hospital? Who will pay for that?
  • What is the purpose of requiring all hospitals to submit an infection control plan to the ISDH? Will anyone read it? Will there be consequences for a hospital submitting a crappy plan? What if a hospital does submit a lame plan? Who's to say that it is lame? Who has the authority to send it back to the hospital for improvement? Ultimately, what's the point?

An alternative to the proposed legislation may be:

  • Rather than reporting MRSA data to the state, why not require all Indiana hospitals to participate in the MDRO module of the CDC National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN). Thus, all hospitals will be reporting data in a consistent method and contributing to a national surveillance database. One of the stated purposes of the NHSN is to "provide facilities with risk-adjusted data that can be used for inter-facility comparisons and local quality improvement activities." The problem with this is that facility level NHSN data is confidential and not available to the public. However, it is better to collect data that has a purpose (ie, for the CDC NHSN) than collect data that has questionable purpose (ie, for ISDH). Either way, facilities become aware of their own MRSA rates. By participating in the NHSN, the data becomes useful to the hospital.
  • Rather than having hospitals submit MRSA control plans to ISDH every 2yrs , why not change 410 IAC 15-1.5-2 (the Infection Control section of the state regulations for hospitals)? Sec 2(b) currently says "There shall be an active, effective, and written hospital-wide infection control program. Included in this program shall be a system designed for the identification, surveillance, investigation, control, and prevention of infections and communicable diseases in patients and health care workers." Why not add a subsection here to say that the written plan must specifically include the surveillance, internal reporting, control, and prevention of MRSA? This way, all hospitals will have an opportunity to show the ISDH the effectiveness of their MRSA control plan during the annual licensing survey. Poor or non-existent MRSA control plans will result in citations.

These two alternate ideas will accomplish what Indiana Representative Noe intended with her legislation but in a manner that will produce less "busy work" and more useful information for the purpose of quality improvement.

Monday, January 12, 2009

Indiana Senate Bill 0349

A list of bills introduced this year is posted on the state website. You can go there directly from here.

Senate Bill 0349 is amusing. It seeks to insert the following text into IC-16-28-1-13:

(e) Before an employee of the state department, whose job duties include inspection of health facilities in a consistent manner, may inspect a health facility, the state department shall provide appropriate and uniform training to the employee.

Is this Indiana moving forward....or catching up with the other states?